^ See, e.g., Ralph S. Bauer, The Degree of Moral Fault as Affecting Defendant’s Liability, 81 U. Pa. L. Rev. 586, 589 (1933) (explaining that the Roman courts “allowed damages for resulting harm more readily in cases of dolus [roughly, ‘malicious intent’] than in those of culpa [roughly, ‘negligence’]”); Ton Hartlief, Toerekening naar redelijkheid [Reasonable Attribution], in Sluitertijd: Reflecties op het werk van Jaap Hijma 151, 155 (C.G. Breedveld-de Voogd et al. eds., 2020) (observing that under Dutch case law the defendant’s degree of fault bears on whether the defendant is liable to compensate for damage of which his action is a but-for cause); Bjarte Askeland, Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Norwegian Perspective, in Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Comparative Perspective 99, 151 (Helmut Koziol ed., 2015) (“The basic requirements of adequacy are that the damage which occurred was foreseeable and that the damage was sufficiently closely connected to the interests of the plaintiff. . . . The boundaries of adequacy are drawn further where the damage is caused with intent. . . . Also the presence of gross negligence constitutes a reason for making even remote kinds of damage compensable.” (footnotes omitted)).
Назван самый популярный вид вклада у россиян08:59
，更多细节参见viber
Madblog: A Markdown Folder That Federates Everywhere - Fabio's Lemmy。手游对此有专业解读
17:56, 9 марта 2026Мир